Comrades evaluations

Blog critiques :

.
Peter - 3, excellent. He gave me an in depth analysis of this blog, suggested several changes and complimented me on several aspects of the blog. Below you can read his critique and my responses.

.

Leilani - 3, excellent. She was not as in depth as Peter, but made at least one excellent observation - the blog did not have much of "me" in it - it was all notes from class without any personal reactions or responses. I am hoping that "me" became more obvious as the blog progressed.

.

Comrades :

.

Joanna - 3, excellent. Joanna was the glue that kept us together, on track and on time. She would remind us (especially me) of what is due and when, and whenever my ADHD would hit hyper speed during a study session, she would drag me back on task. She would also make sure that all the parts of the assignment were there, and helped, equally with the rest of us, on the content.

Leilani - 3, excellent. Lani was halfway between me and Joanna on the organizational scale. She helped with content, she helped with keeping us on task and she did a lot of rewriting and perfecting the way our papers were written, making them sound a lot more professional than I did typing them in the first place.

Me, Steve - 3, excellent. (Yes, I think everyone was excellent). I did a lot of the typing and formatting of the papers, which didn't always work out the best (the bold debacle of the first paper in mind). I did the physical part of the first project, changing the tire, and a lot of the physical part of the tiling. I helped with content and with keeping the atmosphere from getting too serious. (Comic relief).

.

Overall the three of us worked well together, I do not think that any one of us was burdened with an extra amount of the work. We did develop our own chores, responsibilities for the project that we took over or ended up without any official directive, it just happened. It's a group dynamic that I am looking forward to over the next couple of years.